This disclaimer is here as both a legal notice and a heads up to trolls.

As a legal notice: We do not take any responsibility for any damages or harm incurred as a result of public discourse of the content presented in this site. This site is not meant to incite a revolution or terrorism to achieve it’s goals. We are willing to work with both public and private entities such as governments, corporations and non-profits to make these dreams a reality. One of our core motivators is educating governments so they can make better decisions, instead of suggesting their ideas are obsolete because the people that comprise of them are obsolete and need to be replaced. This site is for informational purposes first and foremost and all discourse is welcome, both agreeing and disagreeing with the ideas outlined, and is a pacifist website.

For the trolls: Criticism based in slanderous and demeaning language meant to incite flame wars, rabble rousing, blind disbelief, extreme polarity and social divides will NOT be tolerated on this website. We welcome constructive criticism that does not end up in insults or the abuse of logical fallacies and cognitive biases to discredit somebody in a bullying manner. The founder of this website has extensive experience publicly and privately debating hundreds of topics with thousands of people, and one thing that has never worked for a person who has considered themselves an experienced debater is resorting to childish behavior. Having a debater’s code of decorum means not only avoiding attacking a person instead of his ideas, but also offering reasons why not as well as reasons why this idea SHOULD and SHOULD NOT work. A third party such as a judge or a jury can be heavily influenced by manipulation of evidence, testimony and other factors. Somebody’s life should not hang in the balance due to these simple factors, guilty or not, and therefore the standard for burden of proof on this website is much higher than in any courtroom on this planet. Only attacking somebody without offering alternatives, and avoiding to answer questions yet considering oneself to be debating DOES NOT fool anyone since it is logically inconsistent with itself and is a classic tactic used by internet trolls that will get everyone nowhere. While we think that any one person or group retains the right to criticize the site and it’s ideas on their own website or medium for discussion, we condemn sloppy journalism and biased reviewing and will not answer any questions that will be posed after being represented in a negative light without good reason and in good faith. First and foremost, we invite all skeptics to join the discussion before automatically jumping on the “down with Reforms for Humanity” bandwagon. This way we can fill out any missing informational gaps and answer unanswered questions before jumping to conclusions that will result in unnecessary, negative media attention. This is not an attempt at censorship, nor are we attempting to subtly funnel you into a narrow set of guiding principles by which to think about this initiative. On the contrary, we want to advance every aspect of human development, including the negative, so that we can better settle our differences and move on as a species. We are here to create, not destroy. Please contribute accordingly.